Web — between the tavor sar and aug, i would choose the tavor.

Shortness for bbl length/velocity, optimal light mounting, weight distribution, side charging.

Web — the tavor is basically an ak in in a bullpup package with great ergonomics.

Apologies in advance for the wall of text, but more context means hopefully better answers.

  • 5 or more.
  • Recommended for you

    Chadd covers down on the pros and cons of a bullpup style rifle.

    The tavor is a simpler but configuration changes require tools and replacing thread.

    Here at r/guns i would like to.

    It has 4 big pros (to me):

    It’s a pro because sometimes different is good, but it’s a con because ars are so common and.

    It's much more accurate, can be shot on both sides with no issue, suppresses better, mounts.

      Web — welcome back my friends!

      The rfb is an absolutely cool looking bullpup, but functionally.

      With practice it's the fastest rifle to reload i've shot.

      X95 breaks in shtf, and you are.

      Imo, scar17 is what i like the most.

      Web — i use a tavor sar as my shtf rifle.

      The ar may be inherently more accurate and lighter overall. but the weight is all up front, which blows.

      Web — the quick list.

      Parts are plentiful and cheap, and you'll never run short.

      I did get my lnib 17 for $1850 so i don’t think the price tag would cloud my.

      Web — yes, the tavor 7 is $1,000 better.

      The only advantage for the x95 is that it's shorter and easier to hold for longer periods of time due to the weight in the.

      Webar15 will probably be a better gun, especially for reloads.

      You may also like

      Web — the tavor is very carefully designed to be simpler than an ak while being very fast to reload.

      Web — i have 17 and ace, and i’ve shot the tavor 7.

      Steyr aug a3 m1.

      Best 5. 56 bullpup.